What is the difference between content validity and face validity?

Content validity and face validity are both types of measurement validity.

  • Content validity refers to the degree to which the items or questions on a measure accurately reflect all elements of the construct or concept that’s being measured. It assesses whether the items are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in measuring the construct.
  • Face validity refers to the degree to which a measure seems to be measuring what it claims to measure. It assesses whether the measure appears to be relevant.

Continue reading: What is the difference between content validity and face validity?

Is age ordinal data?

The variable age can be measured at the ordinal or ratio level.

  • If you ask participants to provide you with their exact age (e.g., 28), the data is ratio level.
  • If you ask participants to select the bracket that contains their age (e.g., 26–35), the data is ordinal.

Ordinal data and ratio data are similar because they can both be ranked in a logical order. However, for ratio data, the differences between adjacent scores are equal and there’s a true, meaningful zero.

Continue reading: Is age ordinal data?

Are data at the nominal level of measurement quantitative or qualitative?

Data at the nominal level of measurement is qualitative.

Nominal data is used to identify or classify individuals, objects, or phenomena into distinct categories or groups, but it does not have any inherent numerical value or order.

You can use numerical labels to replace textual labels (e.g., 1 = male, 2 = female, 3 = nonbinary), but these numerical labels are random and are not meaningful. You could rank the labels in any order (e.g., 1 = female, 2 = nonbinary, 3 = male). This means you can’t use these numerical labels for calculations.

Continue reading: Are data at the nominal level of measurement quantitative or qualitative?