Is it home in on or hone in on?

In formal English, use home in on, not hone in on, when you mean “focus mainly on a particular aspect” or “successfully find a target” (e.g., “The article homes in on the negative issues,” “The video shows the missile homing in on its target”).

Have you tried QuillBot’s free Grammar Checker? You can use it to check that you’re using phrases like “home in on” correctly in your writing.

Read this FAQ: Is it home in on or hone in on?

Is it in or into?

You can use in or into with some verbs like “throw”, “put,” “dive,” and “jump” in some contexts (e.g., “throw it in/into the trash,” “put it in/into the trash,” “dive in/into the water,” “jump in/into the water”).

However, “in” typically indicates location (e.g., “It’s in the kitchen,”) whereas “into” typically indicates movement in the direction of a location (e.g., “She took it into the kitchen).

QuillBot’s free Grammar Checker will help you to avoid confusing “in” and “into” in your writing.

Read this FAQ: Is it in or into?

What’s a synonym for fit in?

Some synonyms for fit in when it means “have or find time to do” are:

  • Find/make time (for)
  • Squeeze in
  • Manage
  • Balance
  • Work (for me, you, etc.)

Some synonyms for fit in when it means “belong to a group” are:

  • Integrate
  • Get along (with)
  • Assimilate
  • Work (well with)

QuillBot’s free Paraphraser will help you to find the best synonym for “fit in” in your specific context.

Read this FAQ: What’s a synonym for fit in?

Is it nobody or no body?

The correct English spelling is “nobody” (one word) instead of “no body” (two words). “Nobody” is a negative and an indefinite pronoun that means “not one person.” It’s the opposite of “anybody.”

A sentence that uses “nobody” should not use another negative—such as “not” or “never.” For example, “There was nobody else on the bus” is correct, but “There wasn’t nobody on the bus” is incorrect because it’s a double negative.

QuillBot’s free Grammar Checker can help you instantly find and fix errors with “nobody” in your writing.

Read this FAQ: Is it nobody or no body?

Is for an adverb?

No, for is not an adverb. The word “for” typically functions as a preposition (e.g., “She’s going on vacation for two weeks”), but it can also function as a coordinating conjunction meaning “because” (e.g., “I will go now, for it is late”).

Phrases that begin with “for” often function adverbially (e.g., “… for two weeks”). However, “for” is a preposition in these phrases.

If you use “for” as a conjunction in modern English it can sound very formal or old-fashioned. You can use QuillBot’s free Paraphraser to rephrase sentences that contain “for” as a conjunction.

Read this FAQ: Is for an adverb?