What Is Appeal to Pity Fallacy? | Examples & Definition
The appeal to pity fallacy occurs when an argument relies solely on soliciting sympathy in a situation that requires rational analysis. Instead of focusing on evidence and reasoning, an argument that commits this fallacy tries to sway opinions by eliciting pity or guilt.
The fallacy is also known by the more formal name argumentum ad misericordiam, meaning “argument from compassion” in Latin. Fallacious appeals to pity are easy to find in many contexts, such as advertising, politics, law, and fundraising.
What is the appeal to pity fallacy?
The appeal to pity fallacy is found in arguments that seek to manipulate opinions by invoking sympathy or compassion instead of relying on pertinent evidence or logical reasoning. It is used to influence opinions or decisions without adequately engaging with the substantive merits of the argument.
The appeal to pity fallacy is an informal logical fallacy, meaning that it’s a content-level error in inductive reasoning that renders an argument unsound.
Because the appeal to pity fallacy works by diverting attention from the main topic of debate, it also falls into the category of fallacies of relevance (as opposed to other groups such as fallacies of ambiguity or false-cause fallacies).
An appeal to pity fallacy is also a type of appeal to emotion fallacy, meaning that it attempts to persuade by overriding reasoning through the use of evocative words, imagery, or anecdotes that target a specific feeling.
Are appeals to pity always fallacious?
Emotional appeals, including appeals to pity, are an important component of persuasive communication and aren’t inherently fallacious. Aristotle considered pathos (emotional appeals) to be one of the three pillars of rhetoric, along with logos (logic or reason) and ethos (the speaker’s credibility).
However, appeals to pity are fallacious when they are irrelevant to the subject of debate, or when they are used as a substitute for evidence or logic in the context of persuasion. Arguments that rely exclusively on appeals to compassion to sway opinions are considered manipulative and poorly reasoned.
Empathy often plays a crucial role in understanding the emotional and ethical aspects of an issue. However, it must be applied appropriately, complementing logical reasoning and evidence rather than overshadowing them.
Appeal to pity fallacy examples
Examples of fallacious appeals to pity can be found in the courtroom when the emotional impact of a case is presented inappropriately:
- Undermining evidence and logic: When appeals to pity distract from or diminish the role of logical consistency and substantial evidence, they are fallacious.
- Irrelevant to the context: When appeals to pity are used in situations unrelated to the case’s legal considerations, they are fallacious.
This argument exemplifies the appeal to pity fallacy because it diverts attention from the crime of insurance fraud to the irrelevant subject of the defendant’s difficult childhood, appealing to the audience’s sympathies rather than making a reasoned argument from the law.
Outside the courtroom, examples of the appeal to pity fallacy can be found in many realms of persuasive rhetoric.
In politics, speakers often rely on fallacious appeals to pity to garner support for their actions or positions.
This statement is an instance of the appeal to pity fallacy, as it leverages the nation’s history of striving for freedom to immunize the government from critique over its new security legislation.The argument attempts to prevent any criticism or discussion of the proposal’s legality or potential outcomes through this emphasis on veterans’ sacrifices.
Frequently asked questions about appeal to pity fallacy
- What is an example of appeal to pity fallacy?
-
The following example of an appeal to pity fallacy demonstrates how this fallacy replaces reasoned analysis with sympathy-inducing imagery:
Legislators debate a proposed bill that would require users to register online accounts with their legal names and government-issued IDs. A proponent of the bill tells the story of one teenager who was bullied online and argues, “Too many of our young people are bullied online by anonymous users, and too many of their lives have been ruined. We must protect our children from such dangers if we have any humanity.”
This example of an appeal to pity fallacy focuses exclusively on descriptions of online bullying and its effects on children without addressing the proposed bill’s logistics, potential efficacy, or implications for free speech and privacy.
- What is the difference between the appeal to pity fallacy and red herring fallacy?
-
The appeal to pity fallacy is a specific type of red herring fallacy. A red herring fallacy introduces irrelevant information that diverts attention from the main subject. The appeal to pity fallacy distracts specifically by evoking feelings of sympathy or guilt in an audience.
- What is argumentum ad misericordiam?
-
The appeal to pity fallacy is also known as argumentum ad misericordiam, which is Latin for “argument from compassion or pity.” It involves evoking sympathy to sidestep the core issues of an argument and avoid presenting solid evidence or reasoning.